will now I am a psychologist (no, peaceful, voluntary, are always psychologist ...) in a center that deals with child abuse, but recently I found myself rethinking this matter:
It 's a News May / June of last year, but I should not be forgotten, especially in light of what is happening in recent times. I'm talking
inclusion of the amendment that establishes the existence of the crime of "Rape of minor" against children.
Even just the idea of \u200b\u200bthinking to imagine being able to bring such a concept should be aborrente shudder. How can we think that there is a violence of "mild", especially when committed against a child?? And most importantly, what does it mean "when the violence is minor?"
The promoters of this amendment, the number 1707, have slipped in the decree on wiretapping, to force even those of their own camp, however, might be contrary to vote in favor, hoping maybe less publicity as possible.
The amendment provides that no shots immediate arrest in flagrante delicto in cases of sexual violence "minor."
Sottoporrei a reflection on anyone who follows this blog, before remembering the names of the signatories (PDL area and League).
Think of a child, your son, your nephew, no matter, however minor.
And I thought I heard someone tell a day, a family friend, relative or neighbor sexually abused him. Or better yet, go home and find the person in question with his pants down in attitudes little misunderstanding with this child.
Unless they vent the anger I feel immediately climb on the abuse, would you be willing to consider "minor"?
And I wonder if these petitioners have not been abused a minor at some point in their lives.
The signatories are:
Maurizio Gasparri (PDL)
Federico Bricolo (League)
Gaetano Quagliariello (PDL)
Roberto Centaro (PDL)
Filippo Berselli (PDL)
Sandro Mazzatorta (League)
Sergio Divina (League)
I think these people have disgraced the Italian parliament (which happens quite frequently lately) and I certainly do not deserve the salary nor the status of parliament. Andrei
to listen to the statements of those persons in respect of crucifixes in schools, or the right to choose whether or not the interruption of treatment. And then ask them to support the Italians in front of the reasons for such an amendment, since they deemed it important enough to sign them.
Because when the government says "The success" does not speak of that as well?
0 comments:
Post a Comment